Common Sense for Drug Policy - Link to home page


Sunday, December 21, 2014
Search using CSDP's own search tool or use
Google

WWW Common Sense


Home page

About CSDP

PSA Campaign


Check out these other CSDP news pages:
Afghanistan
AIDS
Anti-Drug Media Campaign
Asia and the US Drug War
Bolivia
Bush's Cabinet
Burma
Canada
Chronic Pain Management
Colombia
Communities Against the Drug War
Conferences & Events
Corruption
DARE Admits Failure
Drug Control Alternatives
Ecstasy
Families Targeted by Drug War
Federal Drug Control Strategy
Hemp News
Heroin & Heroin Addiction Treatment
Higher Education Act (HEA) Reform
Initiatives
International Reform
Laos
Mandatory Minimums
Marijuana
Medical Marijuana
Methamphetamines
Mexico
Narco-Funded Terrorism
New Mexico
Nixon
New York
ONDCP
OxyContin
Pain Management
Peru
Police Shootings & Botched Raids
Prop 36
Racial Profiling
Recommended Reading
Research News
South America
Thailand
Treatment Alternatives to Incarceration
Tulia
United Kingdom Moves Toward Reform
United Nations: News and Reports


Drug War Facts

Research Archive

Coalition for Medical Marijuana

Managing Chronic Pain

Drug War Distortions

Safety First

Get Active!

Drug Truth Network

Links

Drug Strategy

Drugs and Terror

Recommended Reading

Site Map



link to 
Drug War Facts - page opens in new window
Addict 
in the Family

Online Drug Library

Research Resources

Contact Common Sense


DARE Admits Failure


GAO: Research Shows That DARE Is A Failure, Alternative Prevention Programs Do Exist

The General Accounting Office released a review of current research regarding alcohol and other drug abuse prevention programs, particularly DARE, on Jan. 16, 2003. The review, Youth Illicit Drug Use Prevention: DARE Long-Term Evaluations and Federal Efforts to Identify Effective Programs, GAO-03-172R, was prepared in response to a request from Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL).

The GAO report found that "In brief, the six long-term evaluations of the DARE elementary school curriculum that we reviewed found no significant differences in illicit drug use between students who received DARE in the fifth or sixth grade (the intervention group) and students who did not )the control group). Three of the evaluations reported that the control groups of students were provided other drug use prevention education. All of the evaluations suggested that DARE had no statistically significant long-term effect on preventing youth illicit drug use. Of the six evaluations we reviewed, five also reported on students' attitudes toward illicit drug use and resistance to peer pressure and found no significant differences between the intervention and control groups over the long term. Two of these evaluations found that the DARE students showed stronger negative attitudes about illicit drug use and improved social skills about illicit drug use about 1 year after receiving the program. These positive effects diminished over time." (p. 2)

Fortunately, the report noted that proven alternatives do exist. "HHS and Education have identified several programs that show evidence of effectiveness in preventing youth substance abuse and promoted their use in schools and communities. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) within HHS and Education use expert panels to review program information that the programs' developers or others submit and rank the programs on several criteria, such as the scientific rigor of their evaluations and the overall usefulness of their findings for preventing substance abuse. Only those programs that produce a consistent pattern of positive results that have been verified scientifically are recognized as effective, according to SAMHSA."

And yet, in spite of the evidence regarding DARE's failure and the existence of proven, effective prevention programs, the GAO notes that "Established in 1983, DARE operates in about 80 percent of all school districts across the United States and in numerous foreign countries. In addition to the DARE elementary school curriculum, the DARE program also includes middle school and high school curricula that reinforce lessons taught at the elementary school level," and further that "In fiscal year 2000, the Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance, which supports various substance abuse prevention programs for youth, provided about $2 million for DARE regional training centers to support the training of new police officers that help deliver the DARE program lessons. Also, in fiscal year 2000, Education provided states about $439 million in grants for schools and communities under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act (SDFSCA) of 1994. Some of the SDFSCA grant funds could have been used to support DARE. However, Education has no estimate of the amount of SDFSCA fiscal year 2000 state grant funds that were used for DARE."

Program Completely Revised, Reintroduced; Critics Still Skeptical


Faced with mounting criticism and a growing body of evidence, DARE America, the sponsor of the eponymous D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program, has "acknowledged that their strategy has not had sufficient impact and say they are developing a new approach to spreading their message." The New York Times reports that "DARE has long dismissed criticism of its approach as flawed or the work of groups that favor decriminalization of drug use. But the body of research had grown to the point that the organization could no longer ignore it."

The Times also notes that DARE is responding to a new Federal attitude that demands results for its money. According to the Times, beginning in 2000 "the Department of Education said it would no longer let schools spend money from its office of safe and drug-free schools on DARE because department officials did not consider it scientifically proven. The new curriculum buys the program time to prove that it does work."

Several studies have shown that DARE is ineffective and may even prove counter-productive. Still, as The Denver Post noted, "It is now taught in 75 percent of school districts nationwide and in 54 other countries."

Columbia University Study Shows Parenting Key To Keeping Kids From Doing Drugs

A new study by Columbia University's Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse reports that parents are the key to kids avoiding drugs. The Chicago Tribune reported Feb. 24, 2001 that "Children who live with attentive parents stand a better chance of never using drugs than do those with 'hands-off' parents" according to the center's sixth annual report on attitudes of US teens on drug use, peer pressure and parental involvement. CASA released the report in conjunction with US Council of Mayors.

Additional Resources

An excellent paper by Rodney Skager, Professor Emeritus of the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles, titled "On Reinventing Drug Education, Especially for Adolescents,", is available through the website for the group Families and Friends for Drug Law Reform. Dr. Skager's paper was prepared for the 2nd International Conference on Drugs & Young People, April 4-6, 2001 in Melbourne, Australia.

For more information about drugs and kids, check out Drug War Facts.

You can get more information about the new DARE curriculum as well as a copy of DARE America's news release announcing the new program from their website.


Save This Page to del.icio.us

Home Drug War Facts Public Service
Advertisements
Managing Chronic Pain
Get Active About Common Sense Addict In
The Family
Effective Drug
Control Strategy
Drug War Distortions Recommended
Reading

copyright © 2000-2007, Common Sense for Drug Policy
Kevin B. Zeese, President -- Mike Gray, Chairman -- Robert E. Field, Co-Chairman -- Melvin R. Allen, Board Member -- Doug McVay, Director of Research & Editor
1377-C Spencer Ave., Lancaster, PA 17603
tel 717-299-0600 - fax 717-393-4953
Updated: Thursday, July 09, 2009   ~   Accessed: 87142 times
Email us