Drug Policy Reform Moves Ahead Outside US

Hands Across The Water: Cocaine Traffickers Using West African Nations As Transshipment Points On Route To Europe

Law enforcement and human rights officials warn that traffickers are using West African nations as transshipment points for cocaine bound for Europe. Reuters AlertNet on Sept. 22, 2005 ( "Senegal Fights Colombian Cocaine Flooding W. Africa") reported that "Colombian drug cartels are flooding West Africa with tonnes of cocaine bound for Europe but police in Senegal say a crackdown in the major regional port of Dakar can help stem the tide. With hundreds of containers passing through the port every day, Senegal is launching a new brigade of police and customs agents this month to tackle drug smuggling in cooperation with the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 'Cartels active in South America have come to Dakar and set up here,' said Abdoulaye Niang, Senegal's top anti-narcotics policeman. 'Since last year we have discovered structured networks composed of Senegalese, Colombians and Europeans.' The price of cocaine on the streets of Dakar had slumped as drugs flooded the market, Niang said, with the cost of a gram halving over the past year to 8,500 CFA francs, or around $16. 'International trafficking is rising, especially cocaine,' he said. 'We are talking about tonnes of cocaine passing through the port. Last year, in an operation with Spanish police, 15 tonnes were seized -- and that is just a tiny part.'"

According to Reuters, "West Africa is an attractive back door into Europe for international drug traffickers because of its underfunded police, established criminal networks and widespread corruption which means gangs often operate with impunity, officials say. 'The problem of drugs in West Africa falls on very fertile ground because of the inability by the state to exercise its powers, to administer law and order,' said Antonio Mazzitelli, regional head of the UNODC based in Dakar. Some European crime bosses have even set up residence in Dakar, using it as a base to run their regional operations. 'It's not just Dakar, all of West Africa's capitals are being used as transit points or even drug depots,' Niang said. 'Lots of ships from South America are flooding West Africa with cocaine -- especially Senegal, Togo and Ghana.'"

Reuters noted that "Typically, cocaine bound for Europe would leave Brazil and pass through Dakar before being changed to another boat, often in the former Portuguese colony of Cape Verde, a group of islands off the West African coast. 'The drugs come mainly from Brazil, but what you notice is that the owners are Colombian,' said Niang. 'It comes to Dakar to camouflage its tracks: a few days or perhaps a week.' According to Niang, many major drugs seizures made in Europe rely on information from the Dakar police. 'The gangs think we know nothing, we are an underdeveloped police. But that suits us. It makes us more efficient,' he said."

The trafficking shift has also been noted by human rights activists in the United Kingdom. Reuters AlertNet reported on Oct. 6, 2005 ( "Nigerian 'Drug Mules' To UK On Rise - Campaigners") that "The number of women from Nigeria being recruited as drug couriers is rising sharply after a clampdown in Jamaica hit the hiring of smugglers there, drug experts and prisoners' rights campaigners have warned. 'Our main concern now is Nigeria,' said Olga Heaven, director of Hibiscus, a charity that supports foreign prisoners in British jails and which led the Caribbean drive to stop women being lured into being 'drug mules.' 'We now have well over 100 Nigerian women in British prisons. That figure could treble in the next six months,' she told Reuters. West Africa is seen as an attractive transit centre for drug traffickers because criminal networks there have proved notoriously difficult for police and customs to break. These criminal gangs are well placed to sell drugs to West African nationals living in the West and to recruit couriers among a cheap labour force at home."

According to Reuters, "'We had a terrible problem as hundreds of Jamaican women were coming in. A huge education campaign was launched in Jamaica telling them about the consequences,' Heaven said. 'It worked. Now there has been a direct shift to Nigeria.' The drug couriers get paid up to 5,000 pounds ($8,850) for bringing in up to four kilos of cocaine, she said. They could face 20 years in a British jail if caught. United Nations experts say South American drug cartels are moving into West Africa, lured by lax policing and the presence of criminal groups to work for them. 'If you look at recent seizures of cocaine, the biggest are all linked to groups with operations on the West African coast,' Antonio Mazzitelli, head of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, told Reuters in a recent interview in Senegal."

Reuters noted that "In Jamaica, a TV promotion campaign showed the cautionary tale of Eva, a Jamaican woman duped and bribed into carrying drugs into Britain where she was caught. Prison activists and drug experts believe a similar approach would work in Nigeria. 'There are 4,300 women in prison in Britain. Over 1,000 are foreign nationals,' Heaven said. 'The bottom line is poverty and lack of information,' she said of single women desperate to borrow money for schooling or to finance hospital treatment for relatives. 'The consequence for the families of these women are devastating,' said Dr Axel Klein, who worked for the UN drug control programme in Nigeria's main city Lagos for several years. Klein, now lecturer in addiction at the University of Canterbury, told Reuters: 'These women have no idea what they are letting themselves in for. A prevention campaign in Nigeria would go a long way to dissuade them from becoming couriers,' he said."

Iraq Becoming Transit Nation On Heroin Trail

Post-war Iraq is becoming a major transit point for the heroin trade, officials are now warning. The London Sunday Telegraph reported on Sept. 4, 2005 ( "Heroin Trade Thrives On Back Of Chaos And Terror In Iraq") that "Fears that lawless post-war Iraq is becoming a haven for international drug trafficking have escalated after the country's biggest ever seizure of heroin. Officers posing as would-be buyers found 20kg of the drug hidden in a car on Monday, the latest in a string of increasingly large seizures in the past year. The Afghan-produced heroin comes in via Iraq's porous border with Iran, creating what United Nations officials say is an important new drug route to Europe and Britain. During Saddam Hussein's rule, heroin was virtually unknown in Iraq because of his police-state law enforcement, which imposed the death penalty even for possession. Since his fall, however, the lawless environment has offered the perfect conditions for smuggling, promising a lucrative income for terrorists and other criminals."

According to the Telegraph, "Monday's seizure took place in the Shia holy city of Kerbala, 100 miles south of Baghdad, where the regular pilgrimages of Shias from Iran give smugglers easy cover. Major Mehdi Saleh, the head of Kerbala's major crimes unit, told The Sunday Telegraph: 'We arrested three Iraqis with 20kg of heroin and 40kg of hashish. Half of the drugs were hidden inside the car's body in a professional manner. This is our biggest seizure but it's not the first. We have carried out at least 30 operations like this in the past year.' The seizure followed warnings from UN officials in May that Afghan traffickers were allying with insurgents to turn Iraq into a leading drugs transit area between Asia and Europe. 'Whether it is due to war or disaster, weakening of border controls and security infrastructure make countries into convenient logistic and transit points, not only for international terrorists and militants but also for drug traffickers,' said Hamid Ghodse, the president of the International Narcotics Control Board."

The Telegraph noted that "Iraq's new government is training its fledgling police force in drug-fighting measures, but says drugs will be given little priority as long as the fight against insurgents is raging. Ra'ad Mehdi Abdul Saad, of the interior ministry's new drugs office, said: 'It happens because we have a weak security system and the border is not protected by the Iraqi forces. For the past year I have been asking for sniffer dogs at the borders but there is no response.' Heroin is increasingly popular among Iraqis driven to blot out the numerous woes of everyday life. Figures compiled by Iraq's health ministry last year estimated that Kerbala alone had almost 1,000 addicts. British-controlled Amara, a smaller city of 300,000 near the Iranian border, had 500. 'We don't have updated figures yet, but we would say that in the past year those figures have probably doubled,' said Sarwan Kamel Ali, the head of the health ministry's new anti-drugs programme. 'In the old days people would take pharmaceutical drugs. Now they take ones like heroin as well.'"

Secret UK Government Report Blasts Drug War

A policy report on the drug war prepared by the Blair government in June 2003 but withheld from the public was leaked to the press in early July 2005.

The Guardian reported on July 5, 2005 ( "Revealed: How Drugs War Failed") that "The profit margins for major traffickers of heroin into Britain are so high they outstrip luxury goods companies such as Louis Vuitton and Gucci, according to a study that Downing Street is refusing to publish under freedom of information legislation. Only the first half of the strategy unit study led by the former director general of the BBC, Lord Birt, was released last Friday. The other half was withheld but has been leaked to the Guardian."

According to the Guardian, "It says that the traffickers enjoy such high profits that seizure rates of 60-80% are needed to have any serious impact on the flow of drugs into Britain but nothing greater than 20% has been achieved. The study concludes that the estimated UK annual supply of heroin and cocaine could be transported into the country in five standard-sized shipping containers but has a value which at a conservative estimate tops [4 billion UK pounds]."

The Guardian noted that "The report was presented in its full form to Tony Blair in June 2003. Only 52 of its 105 pages were published on Friday night on the eve of the Live 8 concert, with a note saying the rest was being withheld under the Freedom of Information Act. The government yesterday defended its decision not to publish the half of the report that delivers a scathing verdict on efforts to disrupt the drugs supply chain. The first 50 pages deal with drug consumption patterns and drug-related crime. A Downing Street spokeswoman said the second half contained information supplied by law enforcement agencies dealing with security matters, it concerned the formulation of government policy and its publication would be prejudicial to the conduct of public affairs. But critics last night said much of the unpublished material was already in the public domain. Among the data suppressed because it was supplied by an agency involved in security is a table on page 12 from the National Criminal Intelligence Service showing average street prices for various drugs. It estimates the average cost for a heavy user at UKP89 a week for cannabis and UKP525 for crack cocaine - information that is presumably at the fingertips of every hardcore drug abuser and dealer in the country."

According to the report itself:
"The drugs supply market is highly sophisticated, and attempts to intervene have not resulted in sustainable disruption to the market at any level. As a result:
"- the supply of drugs has increased
"- prices are low enough not to deter initiation
"- but prices are high enough to cause heavy users to commit high levels of crime to fund their habits" (p. 104)

And also:
"Over the past 10-15 years, despite interventions at every point in the supply chain, cocaine and heroin consumption has been rising, prices falling and drugs have continued to reach users
"- government interventions against the drug business are a cost of business, rather than a substantive threat to the industry’s viability
"- however, by increasing risk, government interventions are likely to have slowed the decline in prices" (p. 94)

China More Humane Than US? Chinese Government Endorses Needle Exchange

In a surprising move, Chinese government officials are aggressively working to slow down the progress of HIV/AIDS by supporting condom distribution and needle exchanges. The San Jose Mercury News reported on June 7, 2005 ( "China Urges Needle Exchanges To Fight AIDS") that " In an aggressive new anti-AIDS push, China's Health Ministry is urging the promotion of free condoms and needle exchanges - strategies previously considered taboo by the conservative communist government. The proposed guidelines urge local governments to tailor those measures to high-risk groups in one of the boldest nationwide campaigns yet against the disease. The most striking proposal calls for combining methadone treatment with needle exchanges to promote safe behavior among drug users - a group almost completely ignored in the past."

According to the Mercury News, "China says it has 840,000 people infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, and 80,000 have the full-blown disease. But health experts say the true figures are much higher and warn that China could have 10 million infected by 2010 unless stronger measures are taken. The government only recently became open about its AIDS epidemic after years of denying it was a problem, although independent activists are still frequently detained and harassed."

The Mercury News noted that "China launched a new national anti-drug campaign last month. Its aggressive new approach on AIDS was praised Tuesday by Randall Tobias, the U.S. global AIDS coordinator. 'I'm very encouraged by the commitment that the senior leadership of the government has made,' Tobias said at a news conference in Beijing. He warned, however, of massive challenges in the countryside, where AIDS has often spread through unsanitary blood-buying schemes. 'It will be a very long journey,' Tobias said. Washington is providing China with $35 million for AIDS from 2004-08."

China's new anti-drug campaign was launched after an unusual admission of failure in its previous efforts. The Taipei Times reported on May 27, 2005 ( "China Admits Drug War Is Failing") that "Chinese officials issued an unusual appeal to the public yesterday for help fighting drug trafficking, acknowledging in a nationally televised news conference that they have failed to stop surging narcotics abuse despite repeated crackdowns. Drug smuggling and the difficulty of fighting it are rising as a result of globalization and freer trade, the officials said, citing the seizure this month of 400kg of the party drug ketamine brought in from India via the Middle East. 'Although we've made a lot of achievements, the spread of drug problems remains serious,' said Yang Fengrui, secretary-general of the National Narcotics Control Commission. 'Heroin use is down in some areas, but the use of new drugs such as ecstasy, marijuana and others is increasing.' Communist Party leaders declared a 'People's War on Drugs' last month, Feng said. He appealed to the public to inform on traffickers and to help addicts reform -- a rare step by a government that usually says it can handle crime and social problems on its own."

According to the Times, "Communist leaders have been increasingly open in recent years about the spreading use of heroin and other drugs. But even by those standards, Feng and other officials at the news conference were strikingly candid about the failure of official efforts to stamp out narcotics abuse. 'Since the beginning of the 1980s, the problem of drugs has been dealt with by the government and the party, but it has never been resolved,' Feng said. Earlier this year, Chinese police announced that two informers split a reward of 200,000 yuan ( US$24,000 ) - a huge sum by Chinese standards - - for a tip that led to the capture of a gang leader accused of making 14 tons of methamphetamine. Last year, Chinese police arrested 67,000 people on drug charges, seized 10.8 tons of heroin and 2.7 tons of methamphetamines, according to a report distributed at Feng's news conference. Some 273,000 people were sent to compulsory drug treatment centers last year, the report said. They said the number of known addicts rose 6.8 percent last year to 791,000, including 679,000 heroin users. Experts say the true figures are much higher. In addition, the report said, 'addicts of new types of drugs such as ecstasy and ketamine, [used] in entertainment places, are increasing rapidly.'"

The Times noted that "In the case this month, police in the southern province of Guangdong, which borders Hong Kong, seized ketamine, methamphetamines, and more than 1.36 tonnes of drug-making chemicals, said Ji Mengyuan, deputy director of the province's Anti-Narcotics Bureau. Ji said 22 members of a drug gang led by a Hong Kong resident were arrested and police seized a drug-making laboratory. Drug smuggling and manufacturing by gangs with ties to Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines also is growing, Feng said."

UNAIDS: Syringe Exchanges Are A Necessary Part Of Global AIDS Prevention Efforts; UN Office On Drugs And Crime: Just Say No

Two reports of great significance were released by United Nations agencies on June 29, 2005.

First, as Reuters reported June 29, 2005 ( "Illegal Drug Trade A World Force"), "Annual worldwide illegal drug sales are greater than the gross domestic product of 88 percent of the countries in the world, the U.N. said on Wednesday. 'This is not a small enemy against which we struggle. It is a monster,' Antonio Maria Costa, head of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), said in an annual report."

According to Reuters, " The UN report, issued in Stockholm, said the global drug trade generated an estimated $321.6 billion in 2003, the latest year for which figures were available. 'The size of the world's illicit drug industry is thus equivalent to 0.9 percent of the world's GDP or higher than the GDP of 88 percent of the countries in the world,' Carsten Hyttel, East African representative of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), told a Nairobi news conference."

However, as Reuters noted, "The bulk of the money - $214 billion - was made at the retail level; drugs sold in streets and back alleys. North America was the biggest buyer, and accounted for 44 percent of all estimated sales, followed by Europe with 33 percent. Africa was in last place with only 4 percent."

Electronic copies of UNODC's World Drug Report 2005 are available from the UNODC website.

Also on June 29th, the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS released a progress report on international anti-AIDS efforts. As the Guardian reported on June 28, 2005 ( "Britain Rebuffs Call To Block Anti-AIDS Needle Exchanges"), "The US is pressing the UN to block the use of needle exchange programmes in countries where drug use is driving the spread of Aids, arguing that the schemes encourage users to continue their habit. But critics, including Britain, believe that the fight against Aids in eastern Europe, central Asia and other parts of the world could be jeopardised if the US manages to water down the UN's policy. The board of UNAids, the UN agency which coordinates the fight against the pandemic, is formulating a global prevention strategy in Geneva."

According to the Guardian, "Britain opposed the US position yesterday, when Gareth Thomas, the international development minister, told the meeting in his opening statement that the UK wants to see 'efforts to intensify harm reduction strategies, including needle and syringe exchange programmes'. He said: 'We support effective harm reduction programmes, especially needle and syringe exchange and methadone substitution therapy because they have been proven to reduce HIV infection among infecting drug users and their sexual partners in many countries.' The UK, he said, had 'a different approach' from the US."

The Guardian noted that "The row is critical, because needle sharing by injecting drug users is the main cause of the soaring figures for HIV/Aids infection in many countries, and provides a gateway for the spread of infection into the heterosexual community through the partners of drug users. Drug injecting is responsible for 80% of the cases in eastern Europe and central Asia, and is also driving the epidemic in a wide range of countries in the Middle East, north Africa, south and south-east Asia and Latin America. HIV prevalence within certain populations of drug injectors exceeds 80%. Europe accepts evidence from studies which have shown needle exchanges to curb the spread of infection, but the US, which will not fund such studies domestically, does not."

This issue, of HIV/AIDS and support for needle exchanges, dramatically illustrates the gap between the UN's drug control agency and the public health & medicine sector. As the Guardian noted, "The issue has already become fraught. At a meeting in Vienna earlier this year the UN agency responsible for the policing of narcotics, the United Nations office on drugs and crime, was forced to accept the US line and oppose needle exchanges. USAid, the American development agency, is not permitted to fund or be involved with programmes that include needle exchange. Democrats are lobbying against the government's position."

(For background on the US pressure on UNODC, see UN Office On Drugs And Crime Buckles Under US Pressure.)

In expressing its support for needle exchanges, the UNAIDS report decried the lack of political will and intestinal fortitude on the part of some governments, primarily the US. According to the report, "Increased testing presents new opportunities to link people to prevention and treatment services, to supply commodities such as condoms and clean injection equipment, and to provide appropriate prevention support for people living with HIV/AIDS as part of the continuum of care."

The report continues: "Injecting drug users have specific prevention and treatment needs, including testing and counselling, needle and syringe programmes [emphasis added], drug substitution therapy and ART. While the need to implement and integrate these services for this population is becoming increasingly clear in the era of ART, political commitment is still lacking in many of the countries where these services are needed most. (p. 21)

The UN Office on Drugs and Crime on the other hand avoided reference to needle exchanges. Instead, they chose to focus on the strategies of convincing injectors to quit injecting and on getting other users to quit using. As UNODC wrote:
"Despite insufficiencies of data, particularly on noninjecting drug use, there is no doubt that the use of drugs, whether injected or taken otherwise, increases the risk of becoming infected with HIV. If injected, the use of contaminated injection equipment can lead to the rapid spread of the virus in the injecting community and beyond. Certain drugs that are not injected can also increase HIV transmission due to their impact on sexual risk-taking behaviour. The sexual partners of drug users, whether drugs users themselves or not, can spread the virus to the larger community, particularly if they are commercial sex workers.
"Consequently, many researchers and analysts believe that the role of primary drug abuse prevention is widely underestimated and neglected for HIV/AIDS prevention. Also important are interventions to prevent noninjecting drug users from becoming injectors, and to encourage those who inject to consider non-injecting alternatives such as substitution treatment." (p. 161)

Russia Decriminalizes Possession

Possession of small amounts of illegal drugs in the Russian Federation was essentially decriminalized in May 2004. The Moscow Times reported on May 14, 2004 ( "No More Jail Terms For Drug Possession") that "Under a new law that came into effect this week, drug users can possess a greatly increased amount of an illegal substance -- for instance, 20 grams of marijuana or 1.5 grams of cocaine -- without the risk of being thrown in jail. The law has been criticized by the Federal Anti-Drug Service, which says it hampers the battle against drugs, but praised by those who work to rehabilitate drug addicts, who predict more addicts will now seek help."

According to the Times, "President Vladimir Putin signed an amendment to the Criminal Code in December stipulating that possession of no more than 10 times the amount of a "single dose" would now be considered an administrative infraction rather than a criminal offense. Punishment would be a fine of no more than 40,000 rubles ( $1,380 ) or community service. It then took five months to hammer out what would be considered the single dose of various drugs."

The Times noted that "Ten times the amount of a single dose, as set in the government resolution that came into effect Wednesday, is 20 grams of marijuana, 5 grams of hashish, mescaline or opium, 1.5 grams of cocaine, 1 gram of heroin or methamphetamine, and 0.003 grams of LSD. Anyone caught in possession of these amounts or less cannot legally be detained, a spokeswoman for the Moscow branch of the Federal Anti-Drug Service said. Instead, a report will be filed and the fine will be determined by a court. This is a major change. Under the old standards, someone caught with 0.1 grams of marijuana, for instance, could be punished by incarceration. Foreigners, even those with deep pockets, should still take the new law seriously, however. Yelena Zhigayeva, a lawyer at the Moscow law firm Haarmann Hemmelrath & Partner, said that by law foreigners who violate Russian drug laws, even if it is only an administrative infraction, can be expelled from the country or denied re-entry."

International Narcotics Control Board Releases Annual Report

The International Narcotics Control Board released its annual report on March 3, 2004. It contained no real surprises, criticizin reform and harm reduction efforts generally while ignoring real drug war abuses. The Winnipeg Free Press reported on March 3, 2004 ( "Vancouver's Safe Injection Site Criticized By UN Group"#&041;, that "In a report released today, the International Narcotics Control Board says the establishment of the drug-injection site in Vancouver last year -- the first in North America -- 'is not in line with the international drug-control treaties to which Canada is a party.' The board is part of the UN International Drug Control Program based in Vienna. It notes that governments have agreed to use prevention and treatment to deal with drug abuse. The report says the board has on numerous occasions spoken out against the operation of drug injection rooms 'where persons can inject drugs acquired with impunity on the illicit market.""

(Editor's Note: This position by INCB flies in the face of the evidence. For more information on the topic, see Drug War Facts: Syringe Exchange and Safer Injection Facilities.)

According to the Free Press, "Herbert Schaepe, secretary of the board, says board members have expressed concerns to the Canadian government, as well as several European governments that have approved drug injection sites or are thinking of establishing them. 'When drug abusers can acquire illicit drugs and can take these illicit drugs into premises which are managed by the state or the town, then there is definitely complicity and we cannot accept that under the international drug control convention,' he says. Health Canada announced last June it would provide $1.5 million over four years for the pilot project in Vancouver to determine whether a supervised injection site can reduce harm to addicts and improve their health prospects. Schaepe dismisses arguments put forth by government authorities, notably Switzerland, that rooms where heroin addicts can safely inject themselves under medical supervision have reduced crime, improved the lives of addicts and persuaded many to check into rehabilitation centres."

Regarding Switzerland, the INCB report this year again criticized the European nation for its heroin maintenance policy as well as its cannabis policy. The Swiss news agency Swissinfo/NZZ reported on March 4, 2004 ( "UN Drugs Body Slams Switzerland"), that "The United Nations International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) has sharply criticised aspects of Switzerland’s drugs policy. The INCB said plans to decriminalise cannabis and the provision of injection rooms for heroin addicts were steps in the wrong direction. The criticism was contained in the INCB's annual report, which monitors the ways in which countries around the world are upholding international conventions on drugs control."

The article goes on to note that "Thomas Zeltner, director of Switzerland's Federal Health Office, says the proposals to decriminalise cannabis simply reflect the reality and have the support of the Swiss public. Earlier this week, Zeltner accompanied the Swiss interior minister, Pascal Couchepin, to a hemp shop, where the minister was apparently 'very impressed' by the variety of cannabis products on offer. 'We think it is better to permit the use and sale of these products in a controlled manner,' Zeltner told swissinfo. 'But [they are meant] for adults only and not for foreigners – we don't want to offend neighbouring countries.'"

According to NZZ, "Zeltner says he is somewhat disappointed by the INCB's criticism. 'We do understand that the INCB as a global player has some difficulty bringing all member states under one umbrella,' he said. 'But at the end of the day, each country has to find its own policy, and that will be different in different countries.'"

The INCB itself came under criticism from human rights activists and others for ignoring the bloody crackdown in Thailand being perpetrated under the guise of a war on drugs. The Asia Times reported on March 5, 2004 ( "UN Hit As Soft On Thai Drug War Deaths"), that "The United Nations anti-drug agency is under fire for its lack of concern over the large number of people reportedly murdered during Thailand's 10-month campaign last year to rid the country of narcotics - a campaign so bloody that even the US State Department has expressed dismay. By the end of the anti-drug campaign - during which officials seized nearly 40 million amphetamine tablets and arrested 52,374 suspected drug producers and dealers - human-rights activists here estimated that close to 3,000 people had been killed."

The articles notes that "Just days after a damning US government report on the same issue, the INCB's 2003 report has also let off Bangkok lightly on the alleged human-rights violations in Thailand's 'war on drugs', which began in February 2003 and lasted until November. 'The board notes that while the government states that the campaign was successful in curbing the drug problem, its unintended side-effects have been widely criticized,' the report stated. 'The board has requested the government to be informed of the results of the campaign, which, it is hoped, would be successful.' When pressed on why the INCB had not been more critical and expressed its own judgment on the consequences of Bangkok's tough anti-drug drive, Fujino [Akira Fujino of the UNODC's East Asia and Pacific Office] affirmed that the INCB had still not received a factual account of the 'war on drugs' from the Thai government. 'Without getting the facts, it is not possible to say what form of law-enforcement activities had been effective or not,' he said. 'We can only act on government sources.' And the government, which enjoyed strong public support for its battle against the growing drug-addiction problem, particularly among young Thais, remains unapologetic for the carnage, insisting that the death toll has been exaggerated in any case. On Wednesday, Rasamee Vistaveth, the deputy secretary general of the Narcotics Control Board, told the press conference that 1,329 people had died in drug-related killings last year. 'There were no human-rights violations during the 'war on drugs',' she said. 'Families can file complaints with the Ministry of Justice if they feel that a relative was wrongfully killed.' The UK-based human-rights lobby Amnesty International is impressed neither by Bangkok's official line nor by the lack of concern shown by the UN. 'The failure by these UN agencies to mention the human-rights violations that occurred during the anti-drug campaign is very disappointing,' said Srirak Plipat, the director of Amnesty International's Thai division."

According to Asia Times, "The annual human-rights report of the US State Department, released last week, was the latest to take Bangkok to task. The department's country report faulted the government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra for the 'excessive use' of 'lethal force against criminal suspects' and also drew attention to the disturbing pattern of 'extrajudicial, arbitrary and unlawful killings' during the crackdown on drugs. 'According to official figures, there were 1,386 narcotics-related deaths between February 1 and April 30, 2003. No arrests were made in 1,195 of these cases, which led many observers to believe police were responsible for most of these deaths,' the report stated. Thaksin, considered a close ally of US President George W. Bush, bristled at the report, accusing Washington of being a 'useless friend'. But Amnesty International had previously arrived at conclusions similar to those made by the State Department and drew attention to the climate of fear around the drug campaign in a report released in November. 'After the launch of the 'drugs war'," it noted, 'many people were reportedly afraid to leave their homes and others avoided traveling to areas where they were not known, for fear of being suspected of being drug traffickers and shot dead.'"

INCB's annual reports are available online from their website, and the new report can also be downloaded directly by clicking here.

European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction Releases 2003 Annual Reports on EU Member States and Candidate States

The agency which tracks drug use in the EU, the European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction, released its two major annual reports on Oct. 22, 2003.

The first, "The State of the Drugs Problem in the European Union and Norway," deals with the current member states of the EU, while the second, as the title indicates, focuses on "The State of the Drugs Problem in the Acceding and Candidate Countries to the European Union."

According to EMCDDA's news release, "Agency chief Georges Estievenart said today: 'Although there are some grounds for cautious optimism when examining the European drugs problem, these are outweighed by concern that we are not having sufficient impact on severe, long-term drug use or on regular drug use by a worrying number of young people in many EU countries. What is more, our indicators suggest that, overall, the drug-use trend remains upwards and new problems are emerging, such as growing cocaine use in some big cities.'
"Chairman of the EMCDDA Management Board Marcel Reimen added: 'On the positive side, we see Europe developing a more coordinated approach to the drugs problem. Overall, there is evidence of a better understanding of what works, and coordination of efforts within and between countries is now recognised as a vital component of effective drugs policy'."

Some selected highlights follow:

"Surveys conducted between 2000 and 2002 estimate that, at least one in five (20%) adult Europeans have used cannabis at least once in their lifetime. Figures for young people between 15 and 34 years are generally even higher, ranging to up to 44% – Spain (35%), France (40%), the UK (42%) and Denmark (44%). Estimates of recent (previous year) use among this age group range in most countries from 5–20%. At the higher end of the scale are Spain (17%), Ireland (17%), the UK (19%) and France (20%), while at the lower end are Sweden (1%), Finland (5%), Portugal (6%) and Norway (8%)."

"The total number of cocaine seizures in the EU has risen steadily since the 1980s with a marked increase noted in 2001. Street prices have stabilised or decreased in all countries in recent years, although they increased in Norway. Cocaine purity remains generally stable in every Member State, although increases were reported in 2001 by Denmark, Germany, Portugal and the UK."

"In most countries, problem drug use is characterised by chronic opiate use, except in Sweden and Finland where amphetamines play a key role. National estimates of problem drug use vary from 2–10 cases per 1 000 adults: some 1–1.5 million Europeans. The highest rates are reported in Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal and the UK (6–10 cases per 1,000 adults). Rates are lowest in Germany, the Netherlands and Austria (3 cases per 1,000 adults)." Further, the EMCDDA notes that though estimates of problem drug use are difficult and must be read with caution, "available data suggest a rise since the mid-1990s in at least half of the 16 reporting countries. Of these, eight report higher estimates of problem drug use: Germany, Spain, Italy, Luxembourg, Finland and Sweden and for injecting drug use Belgium and Norway."

"Countries continue to modify legislation to facilitate the treatment and rehabilitation of drug users and addicts (e.g. Germany, Greece, Luxembourg and Finland)."

"The prevention and reduction of health-related harm associated with drug dependence has become an integral part of the response to drugs across Europe.
"Syringe exchange to prevent the spread of infectious disease through injecting drug use is now well established and widely available in the EU and Norway, although coverage is limited in Greece and Sweden. On the whole, access to sterile equipment has further improved in the past five years. Only in Spain are syringe exchange services implemented systematically in prisons.
"Since the mid-1990s, the evidence-base of medical and educational measures to prevent drug-related deaths has grown considerably and the reduction of the number of deaths is increasingly considered as an achievable goal. A cut in drug-related deaths is identified as a priority in the new national drug strategies of Germany, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal, Finland and the UK. Innovative approaches include the training of risk awareness and first-aid among drug users to prevent fatal overdoses. And there are supervised drug consumption rooms in Germany, Spain and the Netherlands.
"Another important new development Europe-wide is the provision of medical care to drug users through low threshold services, targeting those that are homeless or leading otherwise unstable lives."

The situation in the candidate countries is markedly different. As the EMCDDA noted in a news release on the candidate countries report, "Presenting the report, Agency chief Georges Estievenart said: 'EU enlargement throws up an array of public concerns that cannot be ignored. Among these are increased drug trafficking, escalating drug use in the new Member States and the spread of infectious diseases. But enlargement also offers countries a unique opportunity to benefit from closer collaboration. This report hits a positive note on how progress can be achieved by new and old Member States' working together to respond to this shared problem through sound analysis and better-informed action.'"

Particular highlights follow:

"Today’s report warns that some east European countries are 'threatened by the most rapidly developing HIV epidemic in the world'. In particular it cites recent and sudden increases in HIV infection among injecting drug users (IDUs) in two of the Baltic States – Estonia and Latvia – where infection has spread at an 'alarming rate', with prevalence rates at up to 13% and 12% respectively in national samples of IDUs. Figures from 2001 show a 41% local prevalence rate among IDUs in the Estonian capital Tallinn. And data from the same year point to a 282% rise in newly diagnosed HIV infections among IDUs in Estonia and a 67% rise in Latvia. These rises might be due to the increased availability of heroin in the region in the late 1990s, combined with low risk-awareness among users and high-risk injecting behaviour.
"In most other Central and East European Countries (CEECs) – Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia – the figures are below 1%, lower than in the EU, where prevalence ranges from around 1% in Finland to 34% in Spain. In the third Baltic State, Lithuania, HIV prevalence remains below 5%. There are currently no explosive rises in HIV reported among IDUs in Central Europe.
"Nevertheless, the EMCDDA says that a number of indicators suggest that the potential for serious future problems remains considerable. Increasing HIV prevalence among IDUs poses a potential threat for a spread of the virus to the wider population. This, adds the agency, along with continuing high-risk behaviour, makes strengthening public-health measures a 'must', if HIV epidemics among IDUs and the general population are to be averted."

"Reducing drug-related harm, especially infectious diseases and overdose deaths, is one of the six objectives of the EU action plan on drugs (2000–2004) and a clear priority in most EU countries. Associated public health measures include: providing access to clean injecting equipment; distributing condoms; testing and counselling for infectious diseases; risk-awareness education for drug users; low-threshold drop-in centres; HBV vaccination and HIV/AIDS treatment.
"Although all 10 CEECs have now implemented preventive and harm-reduction measures, provision and coverage are too limited in most of them, in view of the prevalence of problem drug use, risk behaviour and the scale of potential consequences. Some measures – especially syringe and needle-exchange programmes and methadone substitution – remain controversial in many parts of central and eastern Europe. Only the Czech Republic reaches a substantial proportion of IDUs (estimated at over 50%) through a national network of syringe-exchange programmes and low-threshold projects. In Slovenia, a reasonable level of coverage is achieved in some cities. Methadone substitution treatment, which can help reduce health damage, including drug-related deaths and infectious diseases, is available in all countries, but coverage is extremely limited except in Slovenia. However, from 1997–2001 the numbers of clients on methadone increased in some countries.
"The current low levels of HIV infection rates among drug users in most countries should be no cause for complacency. Some studies have shown that high-risk behaviour is widespread. A 2001 study in one region of Estonia reported that 45% of IDUs shared needles. A survey in Budapest the same year reported that 33% shared needles and syringes and 41% other paraphernalia.
"Strong public-health measures to encourage behavioural change among IDUs and to prevent high-risk injecting and sexual behaviour are still scarce in the region. Such measures, if implemented, might save health and social costs for the individual and the community."

"Where legal attitudes to drugs are concerned, some countries have tended to criminalise the possession of drugs for personal use and/or drug use per se since 1990. This contrasts with more recent drug law modifications in some EU countries, which have addressed this question quite differently.
"Nine countries – Bulgaria, Cyprus, Hungary, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Turkey – currently treat possession of a small amount of drugs for personal use as a criminal offence, while three – Czech Republic, Estonia and Latvia – consider this to be an administrative offence. Three countries consider drug use per se to be a criminal offence – Cyprus, Malta and Turkey – although in Malta the offence applies exclusively to the use of prepared opium. Sentences for trafficking are similar to those in the EU."

European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction Releases 2002 Annual Report

The European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction released its 2002 Annual Report on Oct. 3, 2002. The report is available in its entirety from from here, or can be downloaded from here. In addition to the EU report, there are National Reports from member nations and Norway. Also, EMCDDA has issued a report on the drugs situation in Central and Eastern European countries which are candidates for membership in the EU.

Highlights from the reports follow. Generally, EMCDDA reports:
"Cannabis continues to be the most commonly used illegal drug in Europe. Those who have ever taken cannabis range from 10% of adults in Finland to 25-30% in Denmark and the UK. Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland and the Netherlands all report around 20%. In contrast, latest USA data indicate such 'lifetime experience' at 34% of all those aged 12+."
"Estimates of EU problem drug use vary from 2-10 cases per 1,000 population aged 15-46. Highest, at 6-8 per 1,000, are in Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal and UK; lowest in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands, with about 3 per 1,000."

Regarding drug use in prisons, EMCDDA reports:
"The report says the presence of drugs and drug use has fundamentally changed prison reality over the past two decades. All EU countries experience major problems due to drugs and drug-related infectious diseases in prisons."
"Most drug users tend to stop or cut down after imprisonment because they cannot obtain drugs. But others continue to use them -- to an even greater extent in some cases -- and some might even start once incarcerated. Routine information on drug use in prison is rare but smaller local studies indicate alarming levels. Drug use inside prison has been reported by up to 54% of inmates; regular drug use by as many as 36%. Up to 26% of drug users in prison report their first experience while inside -- and up to 21% of IDUs in prison started injecting there. There is more risky behaviour in prison, such as sharing drugs and injecting material, tattooing and prostitution."
"The report shows that the current affair of addiction care services does not match the potential need of the estimated 50%+ of drug users in the prison population. The challenge to strive for 'equivalence of care' between community and prison has still to be met by most prison systems in Europe."
"Even though written information material on drugs and drug-related infectious diseases seems available in most prisons in the EU and Norway, systematic and repeated opportunities to address prevention issues face-to-face are rare and often depend on the initiative of external agencies or individual prison staff. Detoxification is in general offered through medical prison services or in specialised detoxification wards, but quality guidelines are often lacking."
"Except for Greece, Sweden and two Lander in Germany (Bavaria and Baden-Wurttemberg), substitution treatment can be made available in prisons in all EU countries and Norway. However, even in countries where a large percentage of problem drug users in the community are in substitution treatment, prisons often follow a detoxification policy."

Regarding the candidate Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs), the EMCDDA reports:
"The report observes that patterns of CEEC drug use are changing. Imported heroin is progressively taking the place of locally-produced opiates and other substances. At the same time, use is spreading from major urban centres to all regions. Consequently, heroin -- mainly injected -- is the most prevailing substance of problem drug use. This explains the concurrent increase in demand for opiate dependency treatment."
"The EMCDDA goes on to say that, although injecting drug users in CEECs seem to have been relatively spared the HIV epidemic until mid 1990s -- considered to be at a low level -- there is evidence that risky behaviour related to drug consumption is very prevalent."
"The three Baltic states are among the worst affected. Latvia and, in particular, Estonia recently saw 'an alarmingly rapid increase' in the spread of HIV infection among injecting drug users. And, in 2002, a major outbreak of HIV infection was recorded in a Lithuanian prison."
"The agency comments: 'It is imperative to improve the coverage and range of the services provided and to introduce harm-reduction measures into all settings where drug use takes place, including, for example, the prison system."

Quick Note: The United Kingdom is moving ever closer to reform of their drug laws. For more info, see "UK Moves One Step Closer To Reform: Home Secretary Suggests Policy Changes To Parliament," in the CSDP site's UK Update.

Swiss Health Insurers To Cover Most Of Cost For Heroin Prescription For Addicts

The Swiss government announced a new system for prescription heroin, whereby insurers will now pay 75% of the cost of the heroin for users. Swissinfo, a service of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation, reported on June 12, 2002 ( "Health Insurers To Foot Bill For Heroin") that "Under the new system announced by the government, health insurers will be required to fork out 75 per cent of the cost of heroin prescriptions. That works out SFr16.5 million ($10 million) a year, or SFr40 per addict per day. Health insurers already foot a quarter of the bill. Currently 1,169 addicts are given daily doses of the drug as part of the government's Heroin Assisted Treatment (HAT) programme at a cost of SFr55 per addict per day. The addicts themselves are expected to foot the balance - SFr15 a day - but for those without the means to do so the local authorities will pick up the rest of the bill."

Insurance companies are not pleased with the government's plan. Swissinfo reports that "Health insurer, Swica, told swissinfo that, in its view, addicts were a public responsibility and that it was not up to health insurers to see to their needs. 'I was surprised to hear of the government's decision because it doesn't make any sense,' said Swica spokeswoman, Nicole Graf. 'All it does is change who has to pay for heroin medication.' She said ultimately it would be the public who footed the bill, through their health premiums, adding that it would take at least six months to see whether premiums would be raised to cover the additional costs." Swissinfo notes that "Under the HAT programme, addicts receive daily doses of Diaphine (soluable heroin) - under strict supervision - at one of 22 injection centres across the country. Addicts either inject heroin, which is legally produced by a Swiss pharmaceutical firm, or take it orally. Those who have been on the programme for several months - and are viewed as 'stable' - are eventually allowed 'take home' doses of the oral form of heroin or methadone to counter withdrawal symptoms."

The Swiss program has met with a great deal of success. As Swissinfo reports, "In the ten years since the heroin prescription programme was introduced, drug experts say it has saved hundreds of lives. Drug-related deaths, mostly from heroin overdoses, have dropped by half since 1992, while Aids-related deaths among drug users have fallen by a third since 1994. Critics of the scheme have long maintained that the heroin prescription programme fails to wean addicts off drugs. But Dr Daniel Meili, a leading member of the association for the reduction in the risks of drug abuse, insists they are missing the point. 'The final goal is abstinence, but there are a lot of people who never reach that goal,' he told swissinfo in a recent interview. 'If you measure success only by the rate of abstinence you are on the wrong track because that's not the primary goal - first people have to survive.' Meili points out that statistics show that those outside the treatment programme die at a rate of two to three per cent a year. After ten years that means a death rate of 20-30 per cent - 'maybe more', he said. 'For me the programme has been a success because, from a medical point of view, the main aim is to reduce mortality', he added."

The article notes other indicators showing that the program has been a success, for example a drop in crime. "Dr Jürgen Rehm, director of the Addiction Research Institute in Zurich, told swissinfo that other important factors also need to be taken on board when assessing the merits of the programme. He said that by reducing the prevalence of illicit drug consumption some indicators of social integration - most notably criminality - have also improved. This is supported by statistics from the Federal Office of Public Health which show that at the start of their treatment, 70 per cent of addicts are involved in some kind of criminal activity. This figure drops to just ten per cent after 18 months on the programme. Other studies reveal that the economy also benefits since the cost of treating a patient amounts to SFr55 daily, whereas those not on the programme cost the government SFr96 a day in terms of policing, imprisonment and poor health."

Study: UK Cannabis Reform Could Save Millions, Improve Police Image With Public

A report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, a charity based in the UK, estimates that "David Blunkett's plan to downgrade cannabis to the same category as tranquillisers such as valium could save police at least UKP38 million a year," and possibly as much as 350 Million pounds. According to the Daily Telegraph on March 13, 2002 ( "Drug Move Could Save Police Millions"), "The independent report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation also says the move could also vastly improve police officers' relations with the public." According to the Daily Telegraph, "Co-author Professor Mike Hough said the Lambeth experiment - in which Metropolitan Police officers have dealt with cannabis users by confiscating the drug and giving an informal warning - should be extended across Britain. 'It would make sense to reclassify cannabis to Class C,' he said. 'There would be significant gains all round.'"

The report, "Times They Are A-Changing: Policing Of Cannabis," "by South Bank University's Criminal Policy Research Unit, represents the first, detailed study of the policing of cannabis in England and Wales. It has taken place against a backdrop of intensive media and political debate on the issue and the prospect of imminent legislative reform." According to the Rowntree Foundation ( "Study Reveals Widespread Inconsistencies In Policing Of Cannabis on The Streets"), "Many police officers have effectively decriminalised possession of cannabis by turning a blind eye to the offence, or issuing informal warnings. But a small minority of patrol officers 'specialise' in cannabis offences, accounting for a disproportionate number of arrests for possession. The picture of widespread inconsistencies in the treatment of cannabis possession offences emerges from a unique street-level study for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, based on hours of observing what happens 'on the beat' as well as interviews with police and those they arrest. It finds that the chances of being arrested depend on the force areas where an offence is discovered and on the experience and attitudes of individual officers."

According to a summary prepared by the Rowntree Foundation of the report:
"One in seven of all known offenders in England and Wales were arrested fo the possession of cannabis."
"There has been a tenfold increase in the number of possession offences since the mid-1970s. There is no evidence that this increase has been an intended consequence of specific policy."
"Possession offences most often come to light as a by-product of other investigations."
"A minority of patrol officers 'specialise' in cannabis offences: 3 per cent of officers who had made any arrests for possession accounted for 20 per cent of all arrests."
"Arrests for possession very rarely lead to the discovery of serious crimes."
"Officers often turn a blind eye to possession offences, or give informal warnings."
"Of the 69,000 offenders who were cautioned or convicted in 1999, just over half (58 per cent) were cautioned."
"The financial costs of policing cannabis amount to at least £50 million a year (including sentencing costs), and absorb the equivalent of 500 full-time police officers."

The researchers conclude that:
"- re-classification of cannabis to a Class C drug will yield some financial savings, allowing patrol officers to respond more effectively to other calls on their time;
"- the main benefits of reclassification would be non-financial, in removing a source of friction between the police and young people;
"- there would be a very small decline in detection of serious offences, but this should readily be offset by the savings in police time."

The report can be ordered directly by clicking here. A summary of the report can be downloaded by clicking here.

United Kingdom Moves Closer To Historic Reform Of Drug Policies

The United Kingdom is on the verge of making dramatic changes in its drug policies, giving police time and resources to concentrate on hard drugs by easing up on marijuana. The Independent on Sunday reported on March 10, 2002 ( "Cannabis Is Now Just A Signature Away From Legitimacy (Over To You, Mr. Blunkett)") that "David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, will be told this week by his official panel of drug advisers to downgrade cannabis from a Class B to a Class C drug. The change, which would enable users to smoke a joint in the street without fear of arrest, would be the first relaxation of drug laws in Britain for 30 years." According to The Independent, "Yesterday, in a separate initiative, the Liberal Democrats became the first major political party to vote for the full legalisation of cannabis. They also voted for an end to prison sentences for those caught in possession of other drugs, including cocaine, ecstasy and heroin, and called for ecstasy to be downgraded from a Class A to a Class B drug. The vote came as the Home Office considers recommendations from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs ( ACMD ) that cannabis should be given the same status as prescription tranquillizers such as valium, making its possession a non-arrestable offence."

Pressure on the UK government to reform its policies has mounted in the past few months, as the results of research supporting these changes has become public. The Independent in its story noted that "Next Wednesday, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation will reveal that up to UKP50m a year is spent on policing cannabis and the time this involves is equivalent to the work of 500 police officers a year. The Metropolitan Police and the Police Foundation are also compiling separate reports into a pilot scheme by police in Lambeth, south London. Originally planned to last six months, senior officers have found the scheme in Brixton, where cannabis users are not arrested but given on-the-spot warnings, to be successful enough to warrant extending for the time being."

Already, significant changes in policy around the UK are being enacted. In Scotland, for example, the entire direction of drug prevention policy is shifting. As the Daily Telegraph reported on March 4, 2002 ( "'Just Say No' Drugs Campaign Dropped"), "Scotland's 'Just say no' approach to tackling drug taking is to be abandoned in favour of educating young people about the dangers of substance abuse. Concern over the rising tide of drug-related deaths and the increasing number of drug users has prompted a dramatic shift in policy and the Scottish Executive to reject an authoritarian approach. Ministers will announce a new drugs communication strategy this month designed to help young people make informed decisions about drug taking." According to the Daily Telegraph, "Richard Simpson, the Deputy Justice Minister, said yesterday: 'The only time you will hear me use terms such as 'war on drugs' or 'just say no' is to denigrate them.' He stressed he was keen to avoid the impression that the Executive was going soft on drugs, but said young people must be given the responsibility to make informed decisions. Dr Simpson, a former prison doctor, said that he disagreed with giving jail sentences to drug addicts. He said: 'It neither addresses their offending behaviour nor does it cut crime.'"

The UK's government has also taken a step in support of harm reduction efforts directed toward club-goers. A guidebook for club owners regarding safe use of Ecstasy and other club drugs has been issued by the UK Home Office. According to The Times of London on March 8, 2002 ( "Home Office Softens Line Against Dance Drugs"), "In a new set of Home Office guidelines the Government accepts that drug-taking is a part of youth culture that cannot be eradicated. It wants the public to recognise that drug misuse has to be fought on many fronts. The guide underpins the Government's strategy of focusing on dealers and the impact of hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine while developing ways of minimising the harm caused by dance club drugs. It gives clubs advice on how to prevent dealing and how to make the venues safer for clubbers using drugs, including the provision of 'chill-out' rooms, water and better ventilation."

According to the Home Office news release, spokesperson Bob Ainsworth said "It is important that we begin to change the culture and attitudes to drug taking that have become a lifestyle choice for so many young people enjoying the club scene. But we have to recognise that some clubbers will continue to ignore the risks and carry on taking dangerous drugs. If we cannot stop them from taking drugs then we must be prepared to take steps to reduce the harm that they may cause themselves." A PDF copy of the "Safer Clubbing" guide is available from the Home Office's drugs office.

US Issues 2001 Narcotics Certification Determinations On 23 Nations; Myanmar Singled Out For De-Certification, Two Others Receive Waivers

The US State Department issued the annual list of nations certified as cooperating in anti-narcotics efforts in late February 2002. More precisely, because of a change in how State Department phrases it, the US released its list of countries de-certified for not making an effort. According to Rand Beers, Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs at the State Dept., at the briefing on the certification determinations held February 25, 2002, "This year, the President has identified Afghanistan, Burma and Haiti as having failed demonstrably to take substantial efforts during the previous 12 months."

However, the US government is granting waivers for Afghanistan and Haiti based on national security concerns. According to Beers, "The President has further determined that it is in the vital national interest of the United States to provide the full range of assistance to support the new Afghan Interim Authority in the reconstruction of Afghanistan." (For information on the bumper crop of opium poppies expected in Afghanistan this year, see this CSDP webpage on the US drug war in Asia.).

In the case of Haiti, Beers explained that "although tactical cooperation by the Government of Haiti has modestly improved, Haiti's overall counter-drug commitment frankly has remained weak. The Haitian Government has failed to take many significant counter-narcotics actions. While the Haitian Government did enact narcotics in any money laundering legislation in January of 2001, it did not introduce or enact several other key pieces of counter-narcotics legislation; it did not demonstrate effective law enforcement by increased drug seizures, arrests of major traffickers, and successful prosecutions in asset forfeitures." Beers contended however that "US vital national interests require that US assistance to Haiti continue. A cutoff in aid to Haiti includes programs aimed at the roots of Haitian poverty and hopelessness, chief catalyst for Haitian involvement in the drug trade; and illegal immigration to the United States would be aggravated by this already bad situation."

In the case of Myanmar (Burma) however, "Burma's counter-narcotics performance in 2001 was decidedly mixed. The Government of Burma took some useful counter-narcotics measures in the last year, but these measures were far too limited in duration and scope to constitute a substantial effort to meet the standards set forth under US law. Large-scale poppy cultivation and opium production continue, and enormous quantities of methamphetamines, an estimated 800 million tablets per year, are produced in and trafficked from Burma, having serious adverse effects on neighboring countries and throughout the region. Its toleration of money laundering, its failure in 2001 to implement its counter-drug laws, and its failure in 2001 to transfer notorious traffickers -- for example Kung Sa, under indictment in the United States -- are all serious concerns."

The State Department's Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement released its full "International Narcotics Control Strategy Report for 2001 on March 1, 2002. The report evaluates more than 140 countries on their assistance with US drug and money laundering efforts.

International Narcotics Control Board Releases 2001 Annual Report; US-Dominated Board Restates Opposition To Cannabis Decriminalization And Other Policy Reform/Harm Reduction Measures

The UN's International Narcotics Control Board issued its 2001 Annual Report on February 27, 2002. The report offers few surprises and makes the usual criticisms of legal reform and harm reduction efforts (see for example this item on last year's INCB annual report).

The INCB report criticized western European nations for moving toward decriminalization of soft drugs, particularly marijuana. The INCB also singled out Australia for particular criticism regarding the heroin injection room trial going on in New South Wales. As the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported on February 27, 2002 ( "NSW Gov't Rejects UN Criticism Of Heroin Injecting Room Trial"), "In a worldwide report released today, the board says the safe-injecting room trial shows the Government condones the use and trafficking of illicit drugs. The Special Minister of State, John Della Bosca, says the report makes no mention of the fact the Government has promised to provide the board with the results of the supervised injecting room trial in Kings Cross."

The Australia Associated press on February 27, 2002, reported ( "UN Drugs Body Wants NSW Injecting Rooms Closed") that "The injecting room opened after intense debate on May 6 last year, a product of the state's 1999 Drug Summit. Supporters argue it is saving lives and providing referrals to help addicts get off drugs. The centre was currently used by an average 120 injecting drug users a day, its medical director Ingrid van Beek said. More than 800 clients had been referred to counsellors and other medical services and more than 100 overdoses had been successfully treated. There had been no fatalities at the centre."